首页> 外文OA文献 >Complexity, theory and praxis: researching collaborative learning and tutoring processes in a networked learning community
【2h】

Complexity, theory and praxis: researching collaborative learning and tutoring processes in a networked learning community

机译:复杂性,理论和实践:研究网络化学习社区中的协作学习和辅导过程

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper explores the complexity of researching networked learning and tutoring on two levels. Firstly, on the theoretical level, we argue that the nature of praxis in networked environments (that is, learning and tutoring) is so complex that no single theoretical model, among those currently available, is a sufficiently powerful, descriptively, rhetorically, inferentially or in its application to real contexts, to provide a framework for a research agenda that takes into account the key aspects of human agency. Furthermore, we argue that this complexity of praxis requires a multi-method approach to empirical investigation, in order that theory and praxis may converse, with both being enriched by these investigations. Secondly, on an empirical level, and as an example that draws upon our theoretical argument about complexity, we present the findings of a multi-method analysis of the learning and tutoring processes occurring in an on-line community of professionals engaged in a Master’s Programme in E-Learning. This investigation is informed by two mainstream theoretical perspectives on learning, and employs computer-assisted content analysis and critical event recall as complementary methodologies. This study reveals the differentiated nature of participants’ learning, even within a highly structured collaborative learning environment, identifies some of the key functions and roles of participants, and provides an indication of the value of such multi-method studies. Future prospects for this approach to research in the field are considered
机译:本文从两个层面探讨了研究网络学习和补习的复杂性。首先,在理论层面上,我们认为网络环境(即学习和辅导)中实践的本质是如此复杂,以至于在当前可用的理论模型中,没有任何一个理论模型能够在描述,修辞,推论或推论上足够强大。在将其应用于实际环境中时,要为研究议程提供一个框架,其中要考虑到人类代理的关键方面。此外,我们认为,实践的这种复杂性要求对实证研究采取多方法的方法,以便理论和实践可以相互转化,而这两种研究都将使它们丰富起来。其次,在经验层面上,并以借鉴我们关于复杂性的理论论证为例,我们提出了对参与硕士课程的专业人士在线社区中的学习和辅导过程进行多方法分析的结果。在电子学习中。这项调查以关于学习的两种主流理论观点为基础,并采用计算机辅助内容分析和关键事件回忆作为补充方法。这项研究揭示了参与者学习的差异性,即使是在高度结构化的协作学习环境中,也可以识别参与者的一些关键功能和角色,并表明这种多方法研究的价值。考虑了该领域研究方法的未来前景

著录项

  • 作者

    De Laat, M.; Lally, V.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2004
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号